There is no way that I would have bought the Telegraph every day for the past four weeks (and counting), just to establish the details concerning my local MP or interests. However, if the information had been published online as well, I would have readily paid a nominal fee per day, week or visit to read what I wanted to. This story could have been the perfect test bed on which to launch a pay-per-view model and begin to experiment with monetising digital content.
I have always championed the fact that Web 2.0 allows publishers to deliver information in a way that cannot be achieved in ink-on-paper. A searchable database of expenses, with extended coverage and analysis for those who want it, would have been brilliant.
Instead, I see the Telegraph are printing a colour supplement with Saturday's paper - yet more newsprint to wade through. Will it boost copy sales? Watch this space.

A brief addendum to this post - apparently the Telegraph have published the information online (in PDF format?) and most importantly it is 'unredacted'.
ReplyDeleteHowever I still maintain The Guardian's delivery solution is what every paper should be aiming for, albeit redacted.
Hats off to both papers I guess?